ACMJ

Anatolian Current Medical Journal (ACMJ) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Assessing the readability of diabetes information provided by the Turkish Ministry of Health
Aims: The aim of this study is to analyze the readability levels of diabetes-related texts available on the official website of the General Directorate of Public Health of the Turkish Ministry of Health, and to use the findings to guide the preparation of future informational texts.
Methods: This research is a descriptive study based on document analysis, aiming to determine the readability of diabetes-related texts developed by the Turkish Ministry of Health. The data was obtained from publicly accessible educational texts published on the General Directorate of Public Health’s website (Cited 2024, June 20. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/diyabet). The Ateşman readability formula was used to evaluate the readability levels of the texts.
Results: A total of 32 documents under four main headings were examined using the Ateşman formula, and the average readability score of the texts was found to be 61.69±10.15. Based on their readability levels, 28.1% texts were classified as ‘Easy’, 56.2% as ‘Moderately Difficult’, and 15.6% as ‘Difficult’. Among the 13 texts in the Type 1 Diabetes group, 46.1% were ‘Easy’ and 53.8% were ‘Moderately Difficult’. In the Type 2 Diabetes group, 17.6% were ‘Easy’, 64.7% were ‘Moderately Difficult’, and 17.6% were ‘Difficult’.
Conclusion: The readability levels of the analyzed texts in our study are generally in the “Moderately Difficult” category; however, some texts were found to be in the “Difficult” readability level. The readability and understandability of educational materials prepared to improve public health are of great importance. Regular review and optimization of the readability levels of educational materials will enhance public health literacy, contributing to the development of healthier individuals and a healthier society.


1. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians.<em>J Med Internet Res</em>. 2003;5(3):e17.
2. Taşdemir İ. İnternet ortamındaki dişeti hastalığı ile ilgili bilgilerin okunabilirlik analizi. <em>Selcuk Dent J</em>. 2023;10(1):89-93.
3. Muslu M. Y&uuml;ksel Eİ. T&uuml;rkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı tarafından geliştirilmiş beslenme ile ilgili broş&uuml;rlerin okunabilirlik d&uuml;zeyinin belirlenmesi. <em>Bilecik Şeyh Edebali &Uuml;niversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fak&uuml;ltesi Dergisi</em>. 2023;1(2):81-91.
4. Usta Atmaca H, Akbas F, Şak T, Şak D, Acar S, Niyazioglu M. Diyabetik hastalarda hastalık bilin&ccedil; d&uuml;zeyi ve farkındalık. <em>İstanbul Med J</em>. 2015;16(3):101-114.
5. Durukan E. Metinlerin okunabilirlik d&uuml;zeyleri ile &ouml;ğrencilerin okuma becerileri arsındaki ilişki. <em>Ana Dili Eğitimi Derg.</em> 2014; 2(3):68-76.
6. &Ccedil;oban A. Okunabilirlik kavramına y&ouml;nelik bir derleme &ccedil;alışması. <em>Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Derg</em>. 2014;(9):96-111.
7. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. <em>J Applied Psychol.</em> 1948;32(3): 221-233.
8. Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. <em>AU T&ouml;mer Lang J</em>. 1997;2(58):71-74.
9. Harreiter J, Roden M. Diabetes mellitus-Definition, klassifikation diagnose screening und pr&auml;vention (Update 2019) [Diabetes mellitus-Definition, classification, diagnosis, screening, and prevention (Update 2019)].<em>Wien Klin Wochenschr.</em> 2019;131(Suppl 1):6-15.
10. Diyabet 2020-2030 vizyon ve hedefler. ulusal diyabet stratejisi 10. yıl sonu&ccedil; d&ouml;k&uuml;manı 2023. T&uuml;rkiye Diyabet Vakfı (2023)
11. Han A, Carayannopoulos AG. Readability of patient education materials in physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&amp;R): a comparative cross-sectional study. <em>PM R</em>. 2020;12(4):368-373.
12. Tolu S, Basım P. A New perspective on readability and content assessment of patient information texts published on the internet sites on lymphedema. <em>J Current Researches on Health Sector</em>. 2018;8(2):303-314.
13. T&uuml;rkyılmaz AS, Eryurt MA, Akadlı Erg&ouml;&ccedil;men B, et al. 2013 T&uuml;rkiye n&uuml;fus ve sağlık araştırması. Elma teknik basım matbaacılık. Ankara, 2014
14. Klugman J. Human development report 2011. Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. Sustainability and equity: a better future for all (November 2. 2011) UNDP-HDRO Human Development Reports.
15. Murphy J, Vaughn J, Gelber K, Geller A, Zakowski M. Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia. <em>Int J Obstet Anesth.</em> 2019;39:82-87.
16. Dale E, Chall JS. The concept of readability. <em>Elementary English</em>. 1949;26(1):19-26
17. Saldırım HB, Eren M, Kurtuluş N, Kırlaroğlu SN, Şerbet&ccedil;ioğlu MB. Tinnitus ile ilgili &ccedil;evrim i&ccedil;i hasta bilgilendirme materyallerinin okunabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. <em>Balkan Health Sci J</em>. 2023; 2(1):1-6.
18. Sezin RK, Bi&ccedil;en ŞN. Readability and quality levels of online patient information texts regarding hoarseness of voice. <em>J Ear Nose and Throat Head Neck Surgery.</em> 2023;31(3):170-178.
19. Tahir E, Kent AE. Readability analysis of internet-based patient information regarding dizziness<em>. KBB-Forum</em>. 2021;20(2):163-170.
20. Akbulut AS. İnternet ortamındaki şeffaf plak tedavisi ile ilgili bilgilerin okunabilirlik analizi. <em>NEU Dent J</em>. 2022;4(1):7-11.
Volume 6, Issue 6, 2024
Page : 367-371
_Footer